Simpson Diversity Index
A mathematical measure that characterizes both species richness and evenness in ecological communities, accounting for the proportion of each species relative to the total population.
Simpson Diversity Index
The Simpson Diversity Index (SDI) is a fundamental ecological metrics used to quantify biodiversity in ecological communities. Developed by Edward H. Simpson in 1949, this index provides insights into both the richness and evenness of species distributions within an ecosystem.
Mathematical Foundation
The basic formula for the Simpson Diversity Index is:
λ = Σ (pi²)
Where:
- λ (lambda) is the index value
- pi is the proportion of individuals belonging to species i
- Σ represents the sum across all species
The index is often expressed as 1-λ or 1/λ to ensure that higher values correspond to greater diversity.
Ecological Significance
The SDI offers several key advantages in ecological assessment:
- Sensitivity to dominant species
- Less influenced by sample size than other indices
- Incorporation of both species richness and species evenness
Applications
The Simpson Diversity Index finds widespread use in:
- habitat conservation planning
- ecosystem monitoring
- environmental impact assessment
- restoration ecology
Comparison with Other Measures
While the SDI is powerful, it exists within a broader framework of diversity measures:
- Shannon-Wiener Index - emphasizes rare species more than SDI
- Species Richness - counts only number of species
- Berger-Parker Index - focuses on dominance
Limitations
Several considerations affect the application of SDI:
- Sensitivity to sampling effort
- Dependence on taxonomic resolution
- spatial scale effects on interpretation
Modern Extensions
Recent developments include:
- Integration with genetic diversity measures
- Application to functional diversity
- Use in microbial ecology
The Simpson Diversity Index remains a cornerstone tool in quantitative ecology, providing valuable insights into community structure and ecosystem health. Its mathematical robustness and ecological relevance ensure its continued importance in biodiversity research and conservation planning.